Go Back   Bodybuilding Forum - Bodybuilding.net > Bodybuilding Forum > Fat Loss

High or Low Heart Rate for Fat-Burning

Fat Loss discussion on High or Low Heart Rate for Fat-Burning, within the Bodybuilding Forum; Which is better for fat burning? Low intensity (low heart rate) aerobics or high intensity (high heart rate) aerobics? All ...


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-24-2008, 01:19 PM   #1
PsychoJES
Rank: New Member
Experience: 10+ Years
 
PsychoJES's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: The South
Posts: 48
Country:

Gender:
Default High or Low Heart Rate for Fat-Burning

Which is better for fat burning?

Low intensity (low heart rate) aerobics or high intensity (high heart rate) aerobics? All of which are performed at 5:30 AM each day, on an empty stomach. Lifting occurs later in the day, after I get off from work.

Some medical journals suggest a nice, slow, easy pace for directly burning fat. Others suggest high intensity aerobics to burn as many calories as possible. I like interval training between high and low intensities. Any suggestions?

PsychoJES's Sig:He's 6-5, with the afro 6-9. 4 Million dollars a year sure..but he's worth every penny. PsychJES, he defines grace under pressure.
PsychoJES is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2008, 01:22 PM   #2
hrdgain81
Rank: Light Heavyweight
Experience: 5-7 Years
 
hrdgain81's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,715

Default

Its going to depend on your fitness level really. If you can do high intensity interval training (HIIT) I would suggest it. It has been shown to be most effective for fat burning, and body recomposition.

hrdgain81's Sig:I don't do this for my family, my friends, women, accolades, pride, or ego. I do it for me and no one else, its just part of who I am.
hrdgain81 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2008, 01:23 PM   #3
IronKitten
Rank: Bantamweight
Experience: 10+ Years
 
IronKitten's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 698

Gender:
Default

Being that it really comes down to cals in vs cals out, burning more cals in a session is going to be better than trying to hit the 'fat burning zone' with your heart rate.

Also, the more interval type cardio is harder for your body to acclimate to. Unlike SS (constant HR) where you constantly have to increase time and/or speed to get the same results.
IronKitten is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2008, 01:32 PM   #4
hrdgain81
Rank: Light Heavyweight
Experience: 5-7 Years
 
hrdgain81's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,715

Default

IK, I was under the impression that doing high intensity intervals for say 15 minutes, wont burn as many cals durring the session as solid state for 30 minutes, but it works to keep your metabolism higher for a longer period after the workout. Thus making it more beneficial, is that on point, or am I going completely nuts?
hrdgain81 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2008, 01:36 PM   #5
EricT
Rank: Heavyweight
Experience: 7-10 Years
 
EricT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,314
Country:

Gender:
Default

I totally agree. I will go on to say that the first thing your body "wants" to do in regards to any activity is to get better at it. Like IK says you body acclimates to SS and you need more and more of this or that. Basically, with any aerobic activity you body becomes simply more efficient at it. Fat burning is not athletic training.

So just as inerval type training is harder for your body to acclimate to changing things up as often as possible makes it harder as well. It's still about the muscles and just a small change in the muscles used can make a big difference.

EricT's Sig:
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.



To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
or
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


If you act sanctimonious I will just list out your logical fallacies until you get pissed off and spew blasphemous remarks.
EricT is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2008, 01:39 PM   #6
IronKitten
Rank: Bantamweight
Experience: 10+ Years
 
IronKitten's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 698

Gender:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hrdgain81 View Post
IK, I was under the impression that doing high intensity intervals for say 15 minutes, wont burn as many cals durring the session as solid state for 30 minutes, but it works to keep your metabolism higher for a longer period after the workout. Thus making it more beneficial, is that on point, or am I going completely nuts?
That's pretty much it

When you do SS, the cals you burn during the session are all you'll burn from that activity. Whereas higher intensity interval sessions (which can be shorter in time duration ) won't burn as many cals DURING the session, but there's a residual calorie burning with it, similar to what you have post lifting. So you'll continue to burn cals long after you finish the intervals.
IronKitten is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2008, 01:40 PM   #7
EricT
Rank: Heavyweight
Experience: 7-10 Years
 
EricT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,314
Country:

Gender:
Default

If you look at the how to cut sticky Dave and I have an 800 page discussion with someone on this

P.S. I was posting at the same time as Hrdgain, so I didn't mean to step on his post.
EricT is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2008, 01:42 PM   #8
hrdgain81
Rank: Light Heavyweight
Experience: 5-7 Years
 
hrdgain81's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,715

Default

Quote:
(which can be shorter in time duration )
Thank god for small miracles
hrdgain81 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2008, 01:43 PM   #9
hrdgain81
Rank: Light Heavyweight
Experience: 5-7 Years
 
hrdgain81's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,715

Default

hahahah Thats twice eric ... no worries we are on the same page on this one bud!
hrdgain81 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2008, 01:44 PM   #10
EricT
Rank: Heavyweight
Experience: 7-10 Years
 
EricT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,314
Country:

Gender:
Default

LOL, let's take turns.
EricT is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote
Reply

  Bodybuilding Forum - Bodybuilding.net > Bodybuilding Forum > Fat Loss


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:24 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.