![]() |
| |
| | #1 (permalink) | |
| Rank: Lightweight Experience: 3-5 Years Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,590
Country:
Gender: | I ran across this article today, it basically says that milk is better than soy in terms of building muscle mass. I couldn't find the actual journal article for it though. This article doesn't mean anything to me since I don't drink soy milk and wasn't planning on starting, but I know soy has poked its head a couple times in other threads...so enjoy! Here's the link to the site where I got the article in case anyone wants to see the source: http://dailynews.mcmaster.ca/story.cfm?id=4626 Quote:
| |
| | ||
| | |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| Moderator Rank: Heavyweight Experience: 7-10 Years Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 5,844
Country:
Gender: | It's not too surprising to me, really. But on the other hand I've never seen a study funded by the National Dairy Council that didn't show milk to be a miracle worker ![]() |
| | |
| | |
| | #4 (permalink) | |
| Rank: Member Experience: 10+ Years Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: East Coast
Posts: 101
Country:
Gender: | Quote:
That's the first thing I thought of, who funded it? What other possible point could there be to a study of this nature? Who else would care? Doesn't mean the results are skewed but it does establish the economic agenda behind it. I think it's pretty clear that for overall health, soy is much better than milk which is the issue that the NDC is trying to circumvent. I don't see the wisdom in bodybuilders who don't drink milk already to start because of this. Correct me if I'm wrong but I believe that if not the NDC directly than the dairy industry in general is heavily supported by our tax dollars. Nice to know they're being so well spent.. Iron | |
| | ||
| | |