Originally Posted by Ross86
Great article...I haven't read anything that was so biased in quite a while. It's kind of funny because they only talked about one side of the coin. You could write an equally biased article explaining how great his tax plan is. It's pretty misleading. It really pisses me off that the author purposefully didn't explain the reasoning for any of the plan (other than his idle, close minded speculation). I think people should know none of the truth rather than half of the truth if those are the only choices. Take this article with a grain of salt... No offense Matt.
No offense taken sir, I agree its a very biased article, but it brought his plan into a new light for me. I just think that if you want to fund social programs, and you believe in them, there is no need to hide them behind a false veil of tax cuts.
I find it hard to find unbiased media coverage of any of this, but if you take a little from each source, you can come to an equilibium at some point.