Go Back   Bodybuilding.net - Bodybuilding Forum > Bodybuilding Discussion > Training Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-17-2006, 03:04 PM   #11 (permalink)
rfurman24
Rank: New Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1

Default

I am by no means an expert of this subject, but I can tell you from experience that I did notice a difference in chest appearence by changing from incline to decline to flies. I had more "cleavage" from doing flies and the bottom of my chest got bigger from decline and the top got bigger from incline. I took about five years off because I did not have time to go the gym. Now I only have access to a chest press machine and my chest looks completely different.
rfurman24 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2006, 05:16 PM   #12 (permalink)
Darkhorse
Moderator
Rank: Light Heavyweight
Experience: 7-10 Years
 
Darkhorse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: CA
Posts: 4,106
Country:

Gender:
Send a message via Yahoo to Darkhorse
Default

I might as well throw in my whole thread dedicated to my belief that a muscle works as a UNIT, not in different sections.. Like I've said a million times already, if you can flex either your upper, lower, or inner chest without flexing the whole thing, then you've got an argument... Unfortunately, it doesn't work that way.

Split Advocates

I think flyes for chest development is useless. Just cannot compare a 300 lb press (whether incline, decline, or flat) to 40 lb flyes. It's either a PRE or POST set exhaustion technique that isn't needed. Same goes for cable flyes. All they do is work to condition the muscle...Which isn't needed for hypertrophy.

Now, if someone compares incline to decline anything, the difference is simply that inclines recruit more anterior delts into the lift.. The end. If you look at an EMG machine, which measures muscle recruitment for different lifts, it'll clearly show that DECLINE anything recruits the most chest mass. The reason is quite clear. The pectoralis has the simple job of pulling your arm DOWN and INto your body. That's the primary mover.

I can say from experience that my pecs grow just fine doing flat bench.. Case closed. Why? A lot of people I find don't care for the flat bench because they are a "shoulder presser". This means they roll their shoulders forward in the lift, taking the stimulus off of the chest, where it's intended. However, if they were to keep their shoulder blades together throughout the press, and learn to arch their chest focusing on chest activation, they'd all be singing a different toon.

If people are REALLY obsessive compulsive about mapping out their chest into a thousand different sections, then I would pick a heavy press (flat, incline, or decline) followed by some rep work with a different angle (flat, incline, or decline dumbbell press), then rotate every 2 weeks. This example works best with an Upper/Lower split.

If people would prefer a full body workout, and are obsessive about the sections , then map out three seperate workouts.. Essentially picking a different ANGLE to press with every other day. So Monday is flat bench, Wednesday is incline bench, and Friday is decline DB.

Doesn't get much easier than that.

Darkhorse's Sig:"The greater the development and strength of the main muscular structures of the body, the greater the size and strength potential of the small areas of the body." - Stuart McRobert

Orange County Strength Club
Darkhorse is online now   Reply With Quote
 

Reply

  Bodybuilding.net - Bodybuilding Forum > Bodybuilding Discussion > Training Forum


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:36 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC5