Go Back   Bodybuilding.net - Bodybuilding Forum > Bodybuilding Discussion > Training Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-15-2007, 06:16 PM   #11 (permalink)
Diablo0125
Rank: Member
Experience: 3-5 Years
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 69
Country:

Gender:
Send a message via AIM to Diablo0125
Default

Although before talking about the HST...I don't think necessary i wasn't getting the Hypertrophy concept when I was doing the routine I had set up. I incremented the weights just like the routine suggests and I blew past my PR's by 10lbs each rep cycle. So I would think I recreated Hypertrophy to make that possible.

Still undecisive about which routine to do next.
Diablo0125 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2007, 05:36 AM   #12 (permalink)
Darkhorse
Moderator
Rank: Light Heavyweight
Experience: 7-10 Years
 
Darkhorse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: CA
Posts: 4,106
Country:

Gender:
Send a message via Yahoo to Darkhorse
Default

Agreed with everyone.. SD's for THIS particular programming is probably the most important aspect it has. If you don't do the SD, then the first week of each mesocycle is a waste of time with the submaximal weight. It's possible to get strength gains without much hypertrophy without an SD.

Quote:
incremented the weights just like the routine suggests and I blew past my PR's by 10lbs each rep cycle.
That probably had a lot to do with your resetting back in weight and ramping back up again. Oftentimes, backing off of weight is all it takes.

Incrementing the weights like they suggest means you'd hit your preplanned RM's on that final day. How did you hit a PR? I'm guessing you didn't go and find your RM's before the HST cycle and just plugged in what you thought you'd be able to hit?

Quote:
The scheme i follow:

2 weeks 10 reps
2 weeks 8 reps
2 weeks 5 reps
If you decide on that, you'd probably be zig zagging in weight each mesocycle. An example for flat bench would be hitting 300 x 10 on your last 10 RM workout, then resetting back down for the 8's and hitting 315 x 8 (last workout), then resetting yet again.. I'd at least think about increasing your first meso to 12's...

Quote:
Still undecisive about which routine to do next.
I don't think you need a black and white routine that someone else made. If you "can lift massive amounts of weight...have alot of mass with tons of strength" then you pretty much know what works. Bearing Eric's advice in mind, grab a handful of compounds and have at it. You certainly don't need a 5x5 since you've "done countless 5x5 routines and have not noticed any difference in a harder appearance."

Darkhorse's Sig:"The greater the development and strength of the main muscular structures of the body, the greater the size and strength potential of the small areas of the body." - Stuart McRobert

Orange County Strength Club
Darkhorse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2007, 09:51 AM   #13 (permalink)
Diablo0125
Rank: Member
Experience: 3-5 Years
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 69
Country:

Gender:
Send a message via AIM to Diablo0125
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 0311 View Post
Agreed with everyone.. SD's for THIS particular programming is probably the most important aspect it has. If you don't do the SD, then the first week of each mesocycle is a waste of time with the submaximal weight. It's possible to get strength gains without much hypertrophy without an SD.



That probably had a lot to do with your resetting back in weight and ramping back up again. Oftentimes, backing off of weight is all it takes.

Incrementing the weights like they suggest means you'd hit your preplanned RM's on that final day. How did you hit a PR? I'm guessing you didn't go and find your RM's before the HST cycle and just plugged in what you thought you'd be able to hit?



If you decide on that, you'd probably be zig zagging in weight each mesocycle. An example for flat bench would be hitting 300 x 10 on your last 10 RM workout, then resetting back down for the 8's and hitting 315 x 8 (last workout), then resetting yet again.. I'd at least think about increasing your first meso to 12's...



I don't think you need a black and white routine that someone else made. If you "can lift massive amounts of weight...have alot of mass with tons of strength" then you pretty much know what works. Bearing Eric's advice in mind, grab a handful of compounds and have at it. You certainly don't need a 5x5 since you've "done countless 5x5 routines and have not noticed any difference in a harder appearance."

See thats what Im trying to do take components from routines and making one that works for my body. Your right i dont' necessary need someone else's routine and that to be set in stone.

As far as the HST I did everything except the 1 week SD...instead i used that 1 week beforehand to find my PR RM's.

Would it be advisable to run this again? Like I said before I was cautious about doing this because of the large drop in weight going from a 5 rm to the first week ramping up the weights with 10 or 12 rep range?
Diablo0125 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2007, 12:46 PM   #14 (permalink)
Kane
Rank: Lightweight
Experience: 3-5 Years
 
Kane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,590
Country:

Gender:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Diablo0125 View Post
Would it be advisable to run this again? Like I said before I was cautious about doing this because of the large drop in weight going from a 5 rm to the first week ramping up the weights with 10 or 12 rep range?
You could run it again. But the whole point is to have submaximal loading. So your 5RM now won't be the same as your 5RM after the SD. So now your starting the 12 rep cycle with a huge drop from your 5RM at the end of your first run...BUT your 5RM isn't the same as it was because you did that SD. In reality your not dropping the weight as drastically as you think you are.

Its hard to explain....but hopefully that makes sense to you

Kane's Sig:Bench:275 [1x1]
Deadlift:365 [1x3]
A2G Squat:275 [1x3]

"Shut up and squat!"

"NO, this is my squat rack. Go get your own!"
Kane is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2007, 01:25 PM   #15 (permalink)
Diablo0125
Rank: Member
Experience: 3-5 Years
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 69
Country:

Gender:
Send a message via AIM to Diablo0125
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kane View Post
You could run it again. But the whole point is to have submaximal loading. So your 5RM now won't be the same as your 5RM after the SD. So now your starting the 12 rep cycle with a huge drop from your 5RM at the end of your first run...BUT your 5RM isn't the same as it was because you did that SD. In reality your not dropping the weight as drastically as you think you are.

Its hard to explain....but hopefully that makes sense to you
I think I understand the purpose of the SD. To make that RM much harder to reach and in reality to your muscles its a giant gain after deconditioning.

Hope Im on the right track here lol
Diablo0125 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2007, 05:22 PM   #16 (permalink)
Kane
Rank: Lightweight
Experience: 3-5 Years
 
Kane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,590
Country:

Gender:
Default

close enough lol. There are other factors at play as well (cns, blah blah), but yes (imo) its main purpose is to retard your strength progression.

Kane's Sig:Bench:275 [1x1]
Deadlift:365 [1x3]
A2G Squat:275 [1x3]

"Shut up and squat!"

"NO, this is my squat rack. Go get your own!"
Kane is offline   Reply With Quote
 

Reply

  Bodybuilding.net - Bodybuilding Forum > Bodybuilding Discussion > Training Forum


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:10 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC5