| | |
06-15-2007, 01:46 AM
| #11 (permalink) |
| Rank: Light Heavyweight Experience: 3-5 Years  Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Trinity University, San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 3,832
Gender:   |  ok, several things to note. 1.) arnie's program is shit. please stop doing it. its a waste of ur time. 2.) u cant fail @ 5x5. if u fail at 5x5 it means u havent understood it properly. please tell me what 5x5 program u did. |
| | |
|  |
|
06-26-2007, 01:45 PM
| #13 (permalink) |
| Rank: New Member Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 16
| thanks for all the input I plan on sticking with the program I am on as long as it keeps working. why do you all think Arnold's programs suck? I mean he did get good results himself on them( I know he took steroids). Like I said I am just happy to get some results and we will see if they continue if not then you all can say u told me so. thanks again for the good replies I greatly appreciate it. |
|
| |
|
06-26-2007, 02:58 PM
| #14 (permalink) |
| Rank: Lightweight Experience: 3-5 Years  Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,590
Country: 
Gender: | Arnolds program is ALOT of volume and grueling work in the gym. If you could get away with less volume and a workout that wasn't so brutal on you, then why not do it? Honestly you could probably gain more doing a typical 5x5 program or a beginner/intermediate program. Don't forget, Arnie was a pro. It was his job to hit the gym. He devoted all his time to training, recovery, diet, plus he had a little 'help'....That is completely different than the average person hitting the gym and taking a protein shake. Before anyone says anything, I know RC has a job but RC has definitely had more 'help' than Arnie. |
| | |
|
| |
|
06-26-2007, 03:52 PM
| #15 (permalink) | |
| Moderator Rank: Light Heavyweight Experience: 7-10 Years  Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: CA
Posts: 4,106
Country: 
Gender:  | Quote:
| |
| | ||
|
| |
Curveball
Linear Mode
