![]() |
| |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| Rank: New Member Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 9
| just wondering... i'm talking about fairly muscular but not ripped like body builders... i mean like the guys you see in underwear advertisements ... A&F banners say 5' 9" for height |
| | |
| | #2 (permalink) | |
| Moderator Rank: Light Heavyweight Experience: 7-10 Years | Quote:
| |
| | ||
| | |
| | #5 (permalink) |
| Moderator Rank: Heavyweight Experience: 7-10 Years Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 5,441
Country:
Gender: | They all look like skinny little rails to me. If they weigh that much then they must top 6 feet like Hardgain says. It also depends on your frame...how you wear the muscle. |
| | |
| | |
| | #10 (permalink) |
| Rank: New Member | Hey troops, I think the guys in Mens Health and the like are into busting hump on arms and chest and training their abs like crazy. I always notice they rarely show thier legs or wear those shorts that bag down to their knees. I have no qualm about looking like that. I say, if it makes you feel good about yourself then do it. For myself and all us old salts, I like big solid legs and a wide back with funky traps but that is for me. I'de say most of those guys weigh about 185 to 200lbs. Now once you start rocking heavy squats and putting some mass on your legs and back your are gonning to naturaly head up to 220 or so. That is the biggest difference I see with the madel guys and the hard core lifters, not saying the model guys don't lift serious just a different objective. |
| | |