aahh...
see, i firstly didn't read the post fully coz i got bored mi-way...
next, i presumed the first 5 lines to be true and therefore, the entire post is true....
now, when i open this post and read it for the first time... your right eric:
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Eric3237
So much of this is just common sense (that's okay, I guess); much of it is dead wrong.
|
and muscle size is NOT proportional to strength AT ALL...!
forget HST, we have a live example of someone like that right here: me..!
i'm like 170 lbs @ 5'7.... waist 31", chest 42"... and i deadlift what... 130 kgs..!!!
next, look at dave... as per what he's been saying he isnt big AT ALL... but if you notice his lifts in his journal... you'll see that he can DEFINITELY hold his own...
lastly, lets look at 0311... the guys HUGE @ 5'9... AND he's strong...
so, whats being proven here?: size is NOT proportional to strength...
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by 0311
Wanting, did that post come from somewhere like xtrememass.com??
|
ha ha ha ha ha aha ha aha ha