View Single Post
 
Old 06-04-2006, 07:22 AM
P4noz P4noz is offline
Rank: New Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 32
Default

The way I see it, its like if anuj is writting is masters, or a phd. He looks up information that he finds interresting and post it with the reference. And, on the other side, he finds an article that has not been talk about and post it for discussion. And, with some great replys from almost all of the members.
M. Ali, if you dont like the topic, please don't bother. Or maybe you have a problem with this site and the way it's manage. It would be better if youd stop visiting this site, wait 5 years, come back,, and if your not mature enough (wich can happen) you will be told, I'm sure.

Now, to return to the main topic. Should females train differently than males? (DeFranco, Joe) In my opinion, they should not train differently, except of course for the weight lifted. I am finishing my bachelor in biology next year can't wait cause I hate it has hell, and with my few studies in hormones and shit, women can't grow big naturally. They can only get harder and ripped. Of course, muscle is muscle, they will add on, but not like men. The only possible natural way is good genetics

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sleeper
I just believe because of their skelital structure and limited testosterone levels they are VERY suceptable to injury.
Sleeper, you are probably right for the thing about the damn society belief and the whole picture about female bodybuilding. Of course, women don't have a very very high level of testorerone. Since that on average, the adult male body produces about thirty times the amount of testosterone an adult female's body does. In the evolution of mankind, man were hunters and women stayed home and picked berriers and stuff. Technicaly, they are not used to hard training, but a men would die if he would have to have a baby. Now, being more susceptable to injury. I'm not sure about that.
Reply With Quote