View Single Post
 
Old 07-08-2006, 05:42 PM
EricT EricT is offline
Rank: Heavyweight
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,314
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by verb
Hope this answered your question
Um sort of. I think you may have the feeling that I'm trying to run down the product but if you read closely what I said you'll see that's not the case.

No, I wouldn't expect there to be much difference between this and other wms products other than taste.

The point is that dextrose/malto cost pennies! And they work. They have always been the most cost effective, and in my mind most useful things you can buy. And there all high GI carbs, easily and quckly absorbed. That's a lot of competetion for a carb that is WAY more expensive. You keep saying other "products" but the only things that really matter are dex and malto (and 50/50 is better imo). Now there is a big difference in what I am willing to spend on what is basically a starch or a sugar vs. what I am willing to spend on something like creatine (assuming creatine wasn't so cheap!).

But, it sounds like Vitargo (wms in general) has some very definite advantages. But I already said enough in 0311's thread .
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.



To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
or
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


If you act sanctimonious I will just list out your logical fallacies until you get pissed off and spew blasphemous remarks.
Reply With Quote