I tend to agree. Creatine mono was around for a long time and worked well for a lot of people. If your are a creatine "responder", and you probably are then creatine mono should "work" just as well for you as any other creatine. Once you reach saturation levels (there is only so much creatine you can force into your muscles) that's it. You need a glucose transporter, as hardgain said for mono.

Can something like CEE perhaps get the creatine into your muscles quicker? Maybe. I don't really know. But once you've reached that certain level and you're taking it every day anyway I doubt theres a big difference. So what I'm saying is I think the only real difference in effectiveness is how long it takes before those levels are reached.

To me, the biggest reasons to use CEE (and other designer creatines?) are comfort and convenience. CEE needs a much smaller dose. It doesn't need a transporter, and there is less bloating and stomach upset (although this subsides over time with mono).

CEE can be had pretty cheap. But mono is still much less expensive even given the higher dosage required.

So my take would be if you don't mind a LITTLE extra money and you want the convenience go for CEE. But if you feel moneywise that mono would be better DON'T worry and feel that it's not gonna work as well as something else.

__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.



To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
or
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


If you act sanctimonious I will just list out your logical fallacies until you get pissed off and spew blasphemous remarks.