Nope. That's linear. 0311 can argue with me about it

BUT the way it's written will be fine for you. At some point it all just becomes semantics. Especially since there are already a million terms floating around for all these cycling schems. The only reason I point it out is because it's similar to people having their own definition of "intensiy" or whatever. After a while we're not speaking the same language anymore.

*EDIT* Anuj, looking back at the shoutbox I see that 0311 said "seems like you'd like something undulating" (I'm paraphrasing) I'm not at all sure that he meant this WAS and undulating program. He can speak for himself. Sometimes that shoutbox is a pain in the ass as much as I love it.

__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.



To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
or
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


If you act sanctimonious I will just list out your logical fallacies until you get pissed off and spew blasphemous remarks.