Thread: Ant's GVT
View Single Post
 
Old 10-31-2006, 04:27 PM
Darkhorse Darkhorse is offline
Rank: Light Heavyweight
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: CA
Posts: 4,174
Send a message via Yahoo to Darkhorse
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ant
ok so now that I read all of that, I'm not sure that GVT is what I want to be doing. My goal is more bulking than endurance, so maybe I should do something along a 5x5 program?
I think you should still do it IMO. You'll see some returns if you do it for a few weeks I would think. I just don't think it's good for the long haul, and especially lack luster if you follow Poliquin's recommendations for weeks at a time.

10 x 10 for a single exercise isn't very attractive to me, squatting aside. I think you'd be best suited doing the GVT: 2000 instead of Poliquin's GVT. So instead of doing 10 x 10 for a single chest exercise, you're spreading the 10 sets out between 4 exercises, while keeping the minimal rest between sets.

Quote:
Here's a brief synopsis of the more important points of the GVT 2000 program:

- Ten sets of ten, albeit using 4 exercises that stress the muscles from different angles

- The weight you use for the first 9 sets stays the same.

- When you can actually do 10 sets of 10, it's time to add more weight.

- Rest 60 to 90 seconds between sets.

- Pay strict attention to tempo, using 402 for chest, back, and leg movements; and 302 for shoulder, bicep, and tricep movement.
I know my compilation wasn't too favorable to the program, but I'm not saying it wouldn't work either. If you did something like the GVT 2000 for a month, then doing perhaps the AGVT for another few months on top of that, I think it would produce great results.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


I can be found at
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Reply With Quote