View Single Post
 
Old 11-10-2006, 06:41 PM
EricT EricT is offline
Rank: Heavyweight
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,314
Default

Generally I would say the same thing. Your basically contemplating a sudden drop in frequency and then putting some icing on to try and make up. Like the man said, anything may work for a while but honestly I can't agree more that what you did before was a ten time better program.

Is that the same thing? 0311 said it's not 1/10 as good as your current and I said your current is 10 times better. LOL I think that comes to the same.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.



To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
or
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


If you act sanctimonious I will just list out your logical fallacies until you get pissed off and spew blasphemous remarks.
Reply With Quote