View Single Post
 
Old 03-08-2007, 06:22 AM
Fireproof's Avatar
Fireproof Fireproof is offline
Rank: New Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: clutchfitness.com
Posts: 20
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hrdgain81 View Post
I've seen that approach work also, personally I dont like it ... but thats just my prefrence.

And your right, getting into ketosis shouldnt be the main focus. I like the way lyle has the UD2 set up, and that has worked well for me in the past. but IMO at 198lbs you would be best served by using a CKD to drop as much fat as possible before switching to something like the ud2.
What did you not like it? The one thing I liked about it is that it's pretty easy to understand and can be leveraged without counting calories. Good for folks who just won't be detail oriented as much as you try to make them, LOL.

I do prefer UD2 - it's a bit more complicated, but produces superior results when followed. But I agree with you - unless you are sub-15%, one doesn't need to worry about it.

My opinion - any men over 15% bodyfat (woment over 20% or so) can lose weight fairly readily with a basic isocaloric diet at a reasonable deficit.
__________________
Admin @ ClutchFitness.com

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


"Ass busting work + consistency + time = results. Burn that into your head and quit looking for quick fixes and secrets." -Lyle McDonald
Reply With Quote