I have spent my time responding to the specific things you have brought up and most of my points have not seemed to be considered or acknowledged. Since I have already been researching this stuff for quite a while now to work on the sticky I don't feel it is on me at this point to provide even more. It's up to the Monday morining quaterbacks. Everything I've said is backed up by what I have posted so there is the referenced info.

The only reason I am debating this is in the interest of fairness. I also posted a review backing up your own statement of no clinical proof as to long term outcomes.

You brought up the subject and posted a study. I gave valid reasons why that study was not enough to decide anything. Data is about interpretation. I can't post a study to interpret every study you post. My job was to respond to what you said and I did.

__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.



To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
or
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


If you act sanctimonious I will just list out your logical fallacies until you get pissed off and spew blasphemous remarks.