I really really question the mentality that all single leg variations are "more advanced". They have a big balance component, true, but I don't see them as being more advance then a squat. And the whole sport specific thing makes no sense to me also. Many of the single leg variations are simply more functinal than a squat for everyday living, sports aside.

There are many, many valid reasons to include them for all sorts of people.

I don't know why anyone would close their mind to so much. Rip seems to be very rigid on exercise selection. That is the one thing I don't like. But he's a great man, that's for sure.

There is already tons of great information in this thread. But I really hope no one looks at it as a "bible". Never box yourself in and limit your horizons.

__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.



To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
or
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


If you act sanctimonious I will just list out your logical fallacies until you get pissed off and spew blasphemous remarks.