Well I disagree that the study on eggs is not worth talking about. You forget that it COMPARED the two in these patients. It didn't compare them eating raw eggs to "healthy" people with raw eggs. It compared the subjects to the subjects and I'm sure there were controls. Even if YOU were able to digest either better it is still clear that raw egg protein is not AS available. So I think the study is very valid. I understand that you feel that what you are doing if fine and effective and that's OK with me! But the data is there.
NOW I didn't get the study from Wikepedia
I got it from pubmed. Wikepedia sucks but a valid source is a valid source. Just because a bad resource uses a study as a source it doens't mean the source is bad. Some people on wikepedia probably write well research stuff but it gets bastardized. But I think you are saying there are just not many references out there on raw eggs.
I still think that one ACTUAL study on raw eggs trumps "all the guys out there who do it with NO PROBLEM". Lots guys out there do most all of their exercises wrong with NO PROBLEM. No problem nowk, that is. It doesn't mean much to me. Again, I'm not trying to convince you to stop. I'm just saying that lot's of guys doing something doesn't mean anything much to me.
As far as veges....hell yeah, lots of veges are good raw. But like I said before some veges become better for us cooked. On reason is because we have a hard time liberating some of the nutrients from certain plants. There is not simple answer and I think it is best to eat a combination of raw and cooked food. I mean raw potatoes are not a good idea. Go ahead and try it
(just as an example).
Like you said though this is about raw eggs! Getting into a raw food thing could fill a book