Quote:
|
It compared the subjects to the subjects and I'm sure there were controls.
|
Isn't the whole point of a study is to provide these things? I just fail to see why they didn't use healthy subjects and not ones with digestive problems (even if the latter half of the digestive system). Personally, nothing against what you believe, I need more than a single "comprehensive end all" study on unhealthy subjects. That's like that guy Bobo from AM using one or two rat studies as a definitive "I'm right". BTW, I'm not comparing the two of you LOL!
Edit: And you better not take offense to that as that's not what I'm trying to convey!
Quote:
|
Even if YOU were able to digest either better it is still clear that raw egg protein is not AS available.
|
110% my point exactly. We need more than 5 unhealthy test subjects IMHO.
Is it less? Absolutely agreed. But again, I'm not fighting to say that it's as or more bioavailable raw vs. cooked whatsoever! I'm saying it's still extremely beneficial to use raw eggs in your shakes. If I put in 5 eggs and get a return of 15-20 grams protein, then I'll walk out of here with a smile on my face. If I have the time though to make a meal out of eggs, I'll definately cook them..
Quote:
|
I still think that one ACTUAL study on raw eggs trumps "all the guys out there who do it with NO PROBLEM".
|
I'm the opposite as I see it as one study vs. the masses.. It's hard to find that conclusive either way.. But I totally see your point!