It's just that it is a little annoying to have the whole notion of how people view CNS fatigue blamed on one comment I made years ago. This stuff is all over the forums to this day and I haven't made the statement again for years.

I wouldn't be able to ask such questions if I hadn't been quilty of making these assumptions in the past, testing them, and coming up with different views. I was never too much of a regurgitator but I'm even less of one now. But the other side of the coin you talked about is about the ONLY side that has been illuminated on the typical bodybuilding forum...the discussions of years past should bare that out. People go on and on about CNS fatigue, muscle recovery, all of that without really the slightest notion of what would happen in their own training if they did something out of the box. What I am talking about IS the side of the coin that is hidden from the view of most who rely on reflected knowledge.

Keep in mind, however that I am taling about the opposite of what this thread is about. The CNS stuff when most people talk about it is in relation to failure training and post failure training based on high volume and denstiy protocols. I am talking about maximal training and why people avoid that who claim to be interested in strength. Just to clarify....5x5, 3x5, 5x3, 3x3 is not exactly maximal training. It is still relying on the volume mindset rather than the intensity mindset.

__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.



To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
or
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


If you act sanctimonious I will just list out your logical fallacies until you get pissed off and spew blasphemous remarks.