View Single Post
 
Old 05-19-2008, 12:29 PM
EricT EricT is offline
Rank: Heavyweight
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,314
Default

I do that ALL the time. And I'm the one who mentioned the post so it's my job to explain WHY I thought it was interesting if need be. If it was just about boxing I of course wouldn't have mentioned it

Funny thing is Byrd was never a natural heavyweight. He could have had a much more favorable relative strength and speed, etc if he had stuck with light-heavyweight in the first place. It's ironic that he spent all that time that heavy and then had to drop so much "weight" versus fat to get down to his more normal point. Despite the fact of his success as a heavyweight...I'm not discountion that of course.

I couldn't get the article Cosgrove referred to to open.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.



To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
or
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


If you act sanctimonious I will just list out your logical fallacies until you get pissed off and spew blasphemous remarks.
Reply With Quote