Far is I know the only test would be a creatinine test...the end product of creatine metabolism. That test would be competely misleading and unfair because those levels could fluctuate widely based on muscle mass, how much you train, how much read meat you eat, etc. An athlete is going to have higher creatinine levels than a non-athlete. I don't know how they would test for "saturation" or even what that would represent.

Now I'm not sure on this but I think that any extra creatine in your blood derived from the diet or sups, if it is not taken into the muscles, will be converted to creatinine and excreted within a couple of hours.

Well, nothing to worry about anyway. It's not like creatine is essential to your success of course.

__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.



To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
or
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


If you act sanctimonious I will just list out your logical fallacies until you get pissed off and spew blasphemous remarks.