View Single Post
 
Old 09-16-2008, 09:43 AM
EricT EricT is offline
Rank: Heavyweight
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,314
Default

It's a great idea, Ross, but that doesn't work too well either. It just told me I'm an avocado. I beg to differ! I'm no damned avocado. It's correlating everything to how much fat you have in a isolated area as opposed to bf in general. Problem is, from what I'm reading, I myself would have to get into a unhealthy LOW range of bodyfat in order to reach the ratio they say is less risky. It also doesn't take into account frame size and ratios. No matter what numbers I put in (impossilbe numbers for me to boot) there is no way I could ever reach the "low risk" range they talk about for me.

I think waist to hip ratio has more to do with attractiveness than risk factors.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.



To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
or
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


If you act sanctimonious I will just list out your logical fallacies until you get pissed off and spew blasphemous remarks.
Reply With Quote