It's a great idea, Ross, but that doesn't work too well either. It just told me I'm an avocado. I beg to differ! I'm no damned avocado. It's correlating everything to how much fat you have in a isolated area as opposed to bf in general. Problem is, from what I'm reading, I myself would have to get into a unhealthy LOW range of bodyfat in order to reach the ratio they say is less risky. It also doesn't take into account frame size and ratios. No matter what numbers I put in (impossilbe numbers for me to boot) there is no way I could ever reach the "low risk" range they talk about for me.
I think waist to hip ratio has more to do with attractiveness than risk factors.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. or To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
If you act sanctimonious I will just list out your logical fallacies until you get pissed off and spew blasphemous remarks.
|