^^
That's usually the sign of a bs'r. Anyone whose ideas are consistently opposite or radically different from our 'current best knowledge".
Kinryoku..I'm afraid you are lost in the sauce.
You are assuming that you can only ever go about learning in ONE way. Either you "develop theories" or you experiment. NO.
You do both. That is to say there is a hugantic amount of excercise physiology knowledge built up for anybody to dip their ladle into.
We take that. We take the observations and programming knowledge those more experienced. We experiment. We combine, test, synthesize, etc.
What you are doing is a MONUMENTAL waste of time. I KNOW this to be true. This is not a 'best guess'.
You can not find an optimal way to train. This is the "goldilocks syndrome" I've been talking about lately. You're training needs are dynamic and ever changing depending on your status at any one time. Mike Mentzer got that part right at least. Only he chose to make insane assumptions and then develop them into an obsession..
You need a certain amount of chronic stumulus. Life is precious so I really don't see how anyone would be willing to waste years on uneducated and pie in the sky propositions "just to see". You will see you life passing by and you staying the same.
I am abiding by the paradoxical commandments in posting this
