I'm still embarrassed that I put the back strong and beltless article here. The more I've learned and the more I've seen of CHECK, the more I've realized that he is a whack job with virtually no scientific or analytical ability.
Now I have the pleasure of linking this thing where Mell Siff rips him a new one and critiques this thing by CHECK. Must read.
http://www.drmelsiff.com/9334/dr-mel...ltless-part-1/
The issue here is not about whether to wear a belt or not, it's CHEK's analysis, or lack of it, and his insistence on the all powerful ability of the TVA to stabilize the spine.