Bodybuilding.net - Bodybuilding Forum

Well, everyone is entitled to his/her opinion and I respect that. As for your questions, you gotta take it up with all the authors/scientists listed since they are all in compliance with what I posted. I'm confident all your questions can be answered by someone with a degree/PhD. It wasn't hard for me to find the proof. Check it out for yourself and draw your own conclusions. There was alot of times where I was proved wrong and I'm a better man for it. (Not taking away from your perspective) But, from a bodybuilders perspective, the above is reason enough, at least for me, to continue my 40-50 grams per serving of protein without concern.

As for some of your examples of cougars and them eating meat and insects, I think you're getting defensive. They have a genetic limit as do we all. That doesn't have anything to do with the amount of protein humans can eat per serving.

__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


I can be found at
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Yup, science and bodybuilding don't mix in your words then...

The fact of the matter is simply that you cannot prove your myth. I provided scientific studies, ect. You provided that animals eat insects and it's a piece of paper...
Sounds like those animal studies you're talking about huh???? There you go, forgot about that..
Your post is in compliance blahblahblah. Doesn't sound like a 33 year old trying to have a grownup debate is it? If you want to argue with scientific research, go somewhere else. It started off pretty intelligently, but of course you got defensive. I'd rather you just go your own way or something because this is getting pretty stale. Honestly, show me anything besides your "golden opinion" and prove me wrong about you. Otherwise, go post elsewhere. I don't care. Everytime you ask for research backing my advice I gave it pure and simple. You just have your opinions I'm done with this subject. I know I'm right about this and you proved it with getting defensive and argumentative. Enjoy the forum, I'm done giving advice helping people out. I've tried to help this site out as much as I could, Fuck it-

dude, all those links are from 1 source... hardly compelling evidence when 1 researcher came to those conclusions.

and Dr. Lothar Wendt's protein theory can be debated quite easily. if you read anything futher than just that one theory and/or tested some of the theories you'd probably have a much different opion of Dr. Wendt's theory.

"Zing"!!! HAHAHAHAHA I knew I didn't pull it out of a hat after all! Nice one source TAURUS "Zing-- :eek:

C'mon now classy...We were joking around when I talked about that...If you want to twist the truth some more then go ahead. If everyone reviews all your posts they'll find out how much integrity you really have..

Oh yeah...Still no proof :eek:

Dr. Wendt argues that fats only became considered a leading cause of heart disease because of a faulty assumption. Increasing numbers of heart attacks were correlated to increased consumption of animal fats. However, according to statistics, it was actually animal protein consumption which increased tenfold, while fat consumption remained relatively stable.


yet a clearly observable, measureable, and REAL example contradicts Dr. Wendt:

the American Eskimo, who eats nothing but meat and fat and has very low rates of heart disease and are generally healthy. hhmmmm...

:eek:

explain this blood-type/diet interaction in detail as it was not mentioned in the literature i saw from Dr. Wendt's work