Go Back   Bodybuilding.net - Bodybuilding Forum > Main Forums > Training
Register Community Today's Posts Search


Hey there!

It looks like you're enjoying our bodybuildng forum but haven't created an account yet. Why not take a minute to register for your own free account now? As a member you get free access to all of our bodybuilding forums and posts plus the ability to post your own messages, communicate directly with other members and much more. Register now!

Already a member? Login at the top of this page to stop seeing this message.

Don't Fuck With This (or The Making of a Guru)



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1  
Old 11-08-2008, 06:41 PM
EricT EricT is offline
Rank: Heavyweight
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,314
Default Don't Fuck With This (or The Making of a Guru)

Don’t Fuck With This
or: The Making of a “Guru”

I’ve had a lot of people ask me where I do my reading. What books they should read. Etc. While I have endeavored to point them to some good resources I don’t think most people “get it” when it comes to developing concepts, yet. Most of the time what they really want to know is where that ultra-secret font of knowledge is. The one thing that will just open their eyes. An article by some “guru” that will just clear up so many mysteries, they can read it and feel like an instant expert and never have any doubts about their training at all. Funny how doubts is one of the main things that has kept me growing. Doubts tempered with faith, I guess you could say.

Well that ain’t the way it works. There is no one or two sources that has all the answers. No one article. One book. One expert. That is not how research works with ANYTHING. And research is only the beginning.

That reminds me of a comment that Mike Robertson just blogged. Talking about something similar, he said that he would pretty much go by Stuart Mcgill on anything about the back. So would I. But I wouldn't ever just completely ignore someone like Janda as well. And I would never completely ignore my own experience.

There are entire books on my shelf from which, of all the info they contain, I may take on about .02 percent of it. Sometimes research is like searching threw a stack of needles for a specific needle, forget about the haystack.

All the time you're developing concepts. You’re experimenting. Observing. Thinking. Imagining. Synthesizing all of this into an ever-changing philosophy. You take chances. You make mistakes. You remain always the skeptic but you never close your mind. It takes a lot of time and effort and patience. It takes a lot of monotony in your life as well.

Me, I don’t want to be the guru. I don’t trust the guru. Why? Because for every guru who really is all that and a bag of chips, there are one hundred others who have a secret they don’t want you to know.

And that in a way, could just sum it up, couldn’t it? Things they don’t want you to know? Wouldn’t want the student to surpass the teacher would we? Funny how that is my goal when I help people to have them overcome my limits as well as their own. Because that raises me up. More and more I want to “teach people to fish” and if they become a better fisherman than I, isn’t that really the mark of a good teacher? In my own training I seek constant improvement. But the old adage, “those who can’t do, teach” well, the problem is many of those who CAN wouldn’t want to REALLY have others do as well or better. Just not enough of that pie to go around, in their minds.

So what is the secret the “guru” doesn’t want you to know? It has to do with conceptualization. A lot of these people really do have some hardcore knowledge to draw from. But many times the pool they draw it from is somewhat shallow. They have one or two primary sources. Their “authority figures” and what you get from them is THEIR conceptualization of those sources. You get, so to speak, a hand-me-down version of it, if not a watered-down-one.

Something people really fail to miss is that the best people out there in this industry, when they write books, articles, give seminars, and so forth, they do expect you, yourself to conceptualize that info. To use it in the quest to develop your own ideas. Matter of fact the expert who tells you that OPTIMAL is nothing more than a pipe-dream is probably the one to listen to. But then you have the opposite. That is the DON”T FUCK WITH THIS guru. Don’t overthink. Don’t ask too many questions!

Sometimes that is what people need to hear. But if that is all someone EVER says. Then you better be wondering if there is anything underneath.

The ever-popular 5x5’s come to mind. Or Starting Strength. I’ve suggested changes, for instance to starting strength and been hit with “I thought we were not supposed to mess with it”, so many times. Why? Because so and so said so?

Bill Starr and “Bill Starr 5x5’” come to mind. Lots of guys out their talking about bill starr who have never read an original work written by him. I remember writing a thread about always look at the sources! This stuff is like rumors sometimes. First I punched a guy for bumping into me. A few weaks later I broke a guys jaw, knocked all his teeth down his throat, landed him in intensive care, and I’m now being held on 100,000 bucks bail.

The reason you can’t fuck with it is not because of the reasons you think. The real reason is because if you USE YOUR BRAIN and go deeper you may uncover something they don’t want you to know: They are not the “gatekeepers” lol. It ain’t magic. They just read some stuff and did some training, most of the time.

I’ve had people ask me about the book Supertraining. And usually I tell them I wouldn’t recommend it off the bat because it is very confusing and lacks direction. So I’ll say if you want something like that “Science and Practice” is a better bet. Still very technical, but…

Well, Westside develops a lot of it’s concepts from Zatiorsky. But they are Westside’s concepts. It irritates the hell out of me when I see guys on forums talking about
“science and practice” as told by Westside as told by their cousin Bob. Folks, it says right in that book that the info is to be used on a conceptual bases. Yet so many “gurus” expect you to accept an idea of an idea of an idea. I’m only using WSB as a very well known example and nothing more. But don’t talk to me about Zatiorsky if he ain’t sitting on your shelf! It just MAY be that you have a big enough brain in your head to come up with you own interpretations or develop you own concepts from these sources. It just takes more work than excepting everything on the basis of “authority”.

So stop looking for “the big idea” and simply, speaking, put your nose to the grindstone.

Edit* This article is about training
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.



To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
or
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


If you act sanctimonious I will just list out your logical fallacies until you get pissed off and spew blasphemous remarks.

Last edited by EricT; 11-09-2008 at 12:01 AM.
Reply With Quote
 

  Bodybuilding.net - Bodybuilding Forum > Main Forums > Training


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 



 



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:45 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.