Go Back   Bodybuilding.net - Bodybuilding Forum > Main Forums > Training
Register Community Today's Posts Search


new isometrics



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 01-23-2007, 08:37 AM
Kane's Avatar
Kane Kane is offline
Rank: Middleweight
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,238
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by arthur View Post
I want to know the theory behind it as sum cliam it to be safer and give good results.

Safer than what?
Who claims this?
Why don't you ask the people claiming that for the theory?
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 01-23-2007, 09:47 AM
EricT EricT is offline
Rank: Heavyweight
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,314
Default

Isometrics is basically anytime you apply a muscular force against resistance without any movement of the associated joint(s).

I know about the claims you are speaking of. I think people are expecting that you would go and research as much alternative info as you can and come back with specific questions.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.



To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
or
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


If you act sanctimonious I will just list out your logical fallacies until you get pissed off and spew blasphemous remarks.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 01-23-2007, 10:55 AM
Kane's Avatar
Kane Kane is offline
Rank: Middleweight
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,238
Default

How do you apply a muscular force without any joint movement? I'm gonna have to look into this, sounds interesting
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 01-23-2007, 11:03 AM
EricT EricT is offline
Rank: Heavyweight
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,314
Default

LOL, push against an immovable object and you are applying a muscular force but the nothing moves. The muscle contracts but it's length remains constant. I should probably say "appying muscular effort" without any joint movement to be more clear.

The biggest benefit right off the bat is rehabilitation.

Last edited by EricT; 01-23-2007 at 12:30 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 01-23-2007, 02:20 PM
Kane's Avatar
Kane Kane is offline
Rank: Middleweight
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,238
Default

OH! lol, I was thinking you push against a wall...but then you would be pushing yourself back from the wall. Basically I pictured closed kinetic chain exercises. My bad...
__________________
"Pain don't hurt" - Dalton

"NO, this is my squat rack. Go get your own!"

"Damn that's shit heavy" - Wolf


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.



To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 01-23-2007, 02:32 PM
_Wolf_'s Avatar
_Wolf_ _Wolf_ is offline
Rank: Light Heavyweight
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Trinity University, San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 4,794
Send a message via MSN to _Wolf_
Default

eric is right: i use it as one of my 12 rehab exercises.

to the OP: did u come across this on the t-nation site???
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.



To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 01-23-2007, 03:01 PM
EricT EricT is offline
Rank: Heavyweight
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,314
Default

Oh, yeah, Kane, lol, I see what you're saying. It's assuming you are not able to overcome the resistance of your bodyweight because of the exercise involved or because your body is anchored in some way.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 01-24-2007, 12:30 AM
arthur arthur is offline
Rank: New Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 24
Default specific question isometrics

Hi guys,

I'll be more specific.

Isometric exercises are supposed to be more safer than the usual weight lifting exercises.

They are also more productive becuz. -

1.They avoid any intramuscular friction.

2. reduce any momentum factor.

3. Don't have any negative phase where intramuscular friction is supposed to help in lowering the load.

4. They require considerably less motor skill than weight training exercises and hence muscle retention rate is increased.
5. They are similiar to closed chain kinectic exercises & thus muscle retention & strength rate is increased.


Are these claims true.


Arthur
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 01-24-2007, 06:25 AM
hrdgain81's Avatar
hrdgain81 hrdgain81 is offline
Rank: Light Heavyweight
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,713
Default

If you wanna get stronger at pushing walls, then yes. But when you limit your range of motion like this, you will only increase your strength in that perticular position. It just doesnt seem like a logical way to train to me.

It may be safer, but if saftey is really your concern, then start out with machines, then move to free wieghts once your more comfortable.
__________________
I don't do this for my family, my friends, women, accolades, pride, or ego. I do it for me and no one else, its just part of who I am.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 01-24-2007, 06:45 AM
ChinPieceDave667's Avatar
ChinPieceDave667 ChinPieceDave667 is offline
Rank: Middleweight
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: 7th layer.. or DC.
Posts: 2,329
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eric3237
LOL, push against an immovable object and you are applying a muscular force but the nothing moves. The muscle contracts but it's length remains constant. I should probably say "appying muscular effort" without any joint movement to be more clear.

The biggest benefit right off the bat is rehabilitation.
perfect example: Wall sits, just lean on the wall with your back facing it, and act like you're sitting in an invisible chair.
Reply With Quote
Reply

  Bodybuilding.net - Bodybuilding Forum > Main Forums > Training


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 



 



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:40 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.