Go Back   Bodybuilding.net - Bodybuilding Forum > Main Forums > Training
Register Community Today's Posts Search


Hey there!

It looks like you're enjoying our bodybuildng forum but haven't created an account yet. Why not take a minute to register for your own free account now? As a member you get free access to all of our bodybuilding forums and posts plus the ability to post your own messages, communicate directly with other members and much more. Register now!

Already a member? Login at the top of this page to stop seeing this message.

Upper chest area.



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-17-2010, 01:14 PM
EricT EricT is offline
Rank: Heavyweight
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,314
Default

Well it said they were at least able to bench that much since the only criteria they were looking for was that they be able to complete the tests. And the other stuff was a mean so you could literally have some people with a whole lot of experience and some with only a year which was the minimum. Probably they were all over the place in terms of bench press which is what you'd expect.

Everything else pans out as you would expect. Bodyweight bench being around average for college age men and these recruits being stronger than average.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.



To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
or
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


If you act sanctimonious I will just list out your logical fallacies until you get pissed off and spew blasphemous remarks.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-29-2010, 10:34 PM
MajRaj MajRaj is offline
Rank: New Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1
Default

I'm not particularly big on the idea of using machines for chest, but this one in particular has me curious. There aren't any cables and it would seem that it promotes stricter form than a smith variant. Opinions?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-01-2010, 06:36 AM
iron_worker's Avatar
iron_worker iron_worker is offline
Rank: Light Heavyweight
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Saskatoon, Sk, Canada
Posts: 3,272
Send a message via MSN to iron_worker
Default

Why would this promote "stricter form" than other smith variants? The path is still entirely fixed, nothing the user does will change the way it moves.

IW
Reply With Quote
Reply

  Bodybuilding.net - Bodybuilding Forum > Main Forums > Training


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 



 



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:50 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.