Quote:
Originally Posted by Eric3237
I have spent my time responding to the specific things you have brought up and most of my points have not seemed to be considered or acknowledged. Since I have already been researching this stuff for quite a while now to work on the sticky I don't feel it is on me at this point to provide even more. It's up to the Monday morining quaterbacks. Everything I've said is backed up by what I have posted so there is the referenced info.
The only reason I am debating this is in the interest of fairness. I also posted a review backing up your own statement of no clinical proof as to long term outcomes.
You brought up the subject and posted a study. I gave valid reasons why that study was not enough to decide anything. Data is about interpretation. I can't post a study to interpret every study you post. My job was to respond to what you said and I did.
|
Are we still cool? Did you read my apology and explanation?
I DO consider and acknowledge everything you post and we've found common ground on some of this. Most of it I don't agree with or interpret the same way you do ok? That's why we're debating. It's no problem, I could say the same for you. Please don't let it aggravate you.
Besides I though the reason we were debating was for fun ;)
Iron
__________________
There are in fact, two things: science, and opinion; the former begets knowledge, the latter ignorance. -Hippocrates of Cos
"New opinions are always suspected, and usually opposed, without any other reason but because they are not already common." —John Locke
"And you shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.” - Jesus Christ
"Perago Validus"
|