Bodybuilding.net - Bodybuilding Forum

its really annoying. You dont ask the author if you can post his/her material somewhere else, and a lot of the time you never mention the authors name, so there we have copyright issues. And underneath your name it says Library of Routines, which is annoying and weird.

and you post a lot of pointless articles as well, which is also really annoying. Why do you even do it?

Muhammad why are you attacking Anuj for bringing information over to the board If you think the topic is pointless then perhaps you shouldn't click on the thread. Also I don't see how you believe that this thread is pointless at all, considering the fact that this topic is RARELY mentioned on the board?

Then don't read it.


If they post it on the web and don't ask for money, it's free material. Also, if you copy it and post it with out asking for money to see the material there is also no problem. There are no copyright issues. I've always seen, either in the title of the thread or in the body of the thread, the name of the person that the article is from.

__________________
Yesterday is History, Tomorrow a Mystery, Today is a Gift, Thats why it's called the Present.

MONSTER: My Strength Endurance Journal, Part 2: The Strength Endurance Journal Returns <--NEW

BULKING: My 5X5 Journal

CUTTING: My CKD Max-OT Journal, My HST Cutting Journal

Huh?..Muhammad_ali, aren't you from bodybuilding.circus? Whatever arguments you have with Anuj you can leave there..This site isn't anything like .com nor will it be. I see that shit go on all the time over there, which is why I never joined.

Matter of fact, did you make your screen name up or did you copy it from somewhere else? Maybe you should ask Cassius Marcellus Clay if you could use his name.

__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


I can be found at
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Shit, word is spreading...

Muhammad_ali

Age:
15

Like I said, try to keep it constructive because I don't want to turn this place into a circus and the brunt of every other forums jokes.. No REPS are allowed!

The way I see it, its like if anuj is writting is masters, or a phd. He looks up information that he finds interresting and post it with the reference. And, on the other side, he finds an article that has not been talk about and post it for discussion. And, with some great replys from almost all of the members.
M. Ali, if you dont like the topic, please don't bother. Or maybe you have a problem with this site and the way it's manage. It would be better if youd stop visiting this site, wait 5 years, come back,, and if your not mature enough (wich can happen) you will be told, I'm sure.

Now, to return to the main topic. Should females train differently than males? (DeFranco, Joe) In my opinion, they should not train differently, except of course for the weight lifted. I am finishing my bachelor in biology next year can't wait cause I hate it has hell, and with my few studies in hormones and shit, women can't grow big naturally. They can only get harder and ripped. Of course, muscle is muscle, they will add on, but not like men. The only possible natural way is good genetics

Sleeper, you are probably right for the thing about the damn society belief and the whole picture about female bodybuilding. Of course, women don't have a very very high level of testorerone. Since that on average, the adult male body produces about thirty times the amount of testosterone an adult female's body does. In the evolution of mankind, man were hunters and women stayed home and picked berriers and stuff. Technicaly, they are not used to hard training, but a men would die if he would have to have a baby. Now, being more susceptable to injury. I'm not sure about that.