Go Back   Bodybuilding.net - Bodybuilding Forum > Main Forums > Training


Hey there!

It looks like you're enjoying our bodybuildng forum but haven't created an account yet. Why not take a minute to register for your own free account now? As a member you get free access to all of our bodybuilding forums and posts plus the ability to post your own messages, communicate directly with other members and much more. Register now!

Already a member? Login at the top of this page to stop seeing this message.

Strength before size... or maybe not?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
Old 08-22-2008, 12:41 PM
Andrew.cook Andrew.cook is offline
Banned
Rank: Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Lancaster, Ohio
Posts: 353
Default

What you typically see is that gross weight moved is maxed by large body mass, but that a higher weight to strength ratio is common in smaller guys.

I train with a 400lb semi-pro football lineman. "Big Tim" can absolutely manhandle a 300lb log press. Which is all fine and dandy becasue that is 75% of his bodyweight. By comparison I can also manhandle a 150lb log, and I would be willing to bet that I can knock out more reps than he can at 300lbs. We aren't talking about a weak guy, he is athletic and strong. But while his body mass allows for some benefit, it is also a liability.

Look at top end lifts in any sport and compare ratios in weight classes. The above statements become VERY obvious.
Reply With Quote
 

  Bodybuilding.net - Bodybuilding Forum > Main Forums > Training


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes



 



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:42 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.