![]() |
| |
| | #11 (permalink) | |
| Rank: Light Heavyweight Experience: 5-7 Years Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,649
| Quote:
| |
| | ||
| | |
| | #12 (permalink) |
| Rank: Middleweight Experience: 5-7 Years Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Alberta , Canada
Posts: 2,192
Country:
Gender: | Question about this.....I still find it confusing for some reason. I might just be making it that way. Mescocycle 1............5*5 Loading Mesocycle 2: Microcycle 1......5*5 Deload week Mesocycle 2: Microcycles 205:5*5 Intensity Week Microcycle 1 (separate)........Deloading - 1 week Mescocycle 3: Microcycles 1-3 DFHT Loading Mesocycle 3 : Microcycle 4......DFHT Deloading Microcycle 2 (separate).......Specialty work - 2 weeks So for the first 4 weeks (mesocycle 1) should we keep this the same ? meaning if we start a 5*5 we should continue it for the 4-6 weeks ? deload - same program but lower weights ? Intensity weeks (mesocycle 2) now is this a 5RM/3RM/1RM ? for the 2-5 weeks ? because wouldn't mesocycle 1 be intense as well ? DFHT loading.....what makes this any different ? Specialty work....do we totally change up and do something completly different ? |
| | |
| | |
| | #13 (permalink) |
| Rank: Lightweight Experience: 3-5 Years Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,590
Country:
Gender: | ^^ This confused the shit out of me too. That scheme is actually 2 programs! From Mesocycle 1 to Microcycle 1 you're doing the Dual Factor 5x5, and then you do the DFHT. -> DF 5x5 volume phase -> Deload -> DF 3x3 intensity phase -> Deload -> DFHT loading -> DFHT deload I wrote the same question in my journal on page 2 and it goes into one big giant clusterfuck of confusion until I realized the above scheme. Hopefully that lets you answer most of your questions. |
| | |
| | |
| | #14 (permalink) |
| Rank: Middleweight Experience: 5-7 Years Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Alberta , Canada
Posts: 2,192
Country:
Gender: | If that's the case then I think i did my 1st week wrong. I believe i did the DFHT training program. I'm going to look at your journal again (from the begining) Looks like - on your first page you did (almost the same) as what i did thanks |
| | |
| | |
| | #15 (permalink) |
| Rank: Lightweight Experience: 3-5 Years Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,590
Country:
Gender: | My journal starts with a round of DFHT. THEN it goes into the above scheme. So I'm actually doing the -> DF 5x5 volume phase -> Deload -> DF 3x3 intensity phase -> Deload -> DFHT loading -> DFHT deload and I'm currently on the DFHT Loading. When you look at my journal keep in mind that I did a run of HST before the DFHT(first page). Reason being that I was in total mass mode, and DFHT is a big mass program with the benefit of being good with strength (for me anyway) as well. The I did a run of SF 5x5 and I was gonna do a run of DFHT again (page 2), but got fucked up and confused and thought I should be running the DFHT and then the DF 5x5, instead of doing the DF 5x5 THEN the DFHT (pages 3&4). After a bit of debate and alot of confusion I got back on track though. There's nothing wrong with doing DFHT as a standalone program. But if you combine the effects of DF 5x5 followed by DFHT you get more of a synergistic effect IMO. I can see that now, don't know why I couldn't before. |
| | |
| | |
| | #16 (permalink) |
| Rank: Middleweight Experience: 5-7 Years Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Alberta , Canada
Posts: 2,192
Country:
Gender: | I just went through your journal....The first 6 pages really well and I see where the confusion was made. Makes sence to me now..... I will be looking back at it for some reference'sfew things...your 5*5 squat - was it the same weight for all 5 ? bench / JS rows 1x5 (pyramid) - can you give me an example of the pyramid ? |
| | |
| | |
| | #17 (permalink) | |
| Rank: Lightweight Experience: 3-5 Years Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,590
Country:
Gender: | Yep. Whenever you see 5x5 its the same weight across all the sets. Quote:
135x5 155x5 185x5 205x5 225x5 I like to jump up by 20lbs or so to keep a wider spread. I've done pyramids of 5 and 10lbs too, but they feel more like I'm doing a 5x5 than a 1x5. | |
| | ||
| | |